Reflections on Using the Blog as a Medium
To the best of my knowledge, blogs as a legitimate scholarly form is open to debate. Numerous articles are floating around regarding the merit of webtools such as wikis, blogs and podcasts as valid educational instruments. Guides for secondary school teachers outline and suggest that the use of blogs will enhance social learning in a time of technologically-induced isolation for children. Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts by Will Richardson, argues that the use of blogs and other web-based resource allows for more interaction being learning source and user, forming a more flexible and interactive style of learning. The use of blogs in higher education has been discussed by Jeremy B. Williams and Joanne Jacobs for the Australian Journal of Educational Technology. In it, the defence of blogs as a legitimate source of knowledge is taken: “The nature of blogging engines allows for the creation of a legitimate warehousing of captured knowledge, and archiving for later retrieval. As a knowledge management tool, blogs provide the potential for relatively undifferentiated articles of information passing through an organisation to be contextualised in a manner that adds value, thus generating ‘knowledge’ from mere ‘information’. Comments systems and democratic posting privileges allow employees in an organisation to give voice to ideas and provide feedback on procedures in a manner not previously possible in a distributed office environment. Further, personalised responses to news and messages are a simple means of developing an understanding of the collective knowledge of an organisation and a means of broadening that knowledge, thus creating ‘intelligence’ from ‘knowledge’. Thus, in a business context, blogs provide a forum for learning. It logically follows therefore, that the experience of collective knowledge generation can and should be applied to traditional educational environments.” (Williams & Jacobs 2004)
As an experiment into the use of blogs to properly convey my ideas, I believe that the exercise has to be considered a success, but not without some hiccups. In my experience using the blog as the medium to narrate my journey across Canada, as well as discussing topics regarding Canadian music culture, urban communities and other observations, there were some definite questions I faced regarding the blog as a framework of knowledge. The blog bases it success on readership between daily posts on current events, discussion of ideas and the interaction between reader and author. The use of comments and discussion of topics is one of the highlight components to a blog’s popularity. Readers, for example, are able to make instantaneous comments and debate the contents of a recent blog post with other readers on any blog that posts on a regular (daily or weekly) basis. The problem felt with The Movable Beast was the nature of the tour journal and the corresponding material regarding Canadian music and underground culture limited debate or comment with any readership. Also, posts on The Movable Beast did not discuss events in a traditional chronological manner. Some blog posts were entered onto the website months after actual described events occurred, in effect creating two separate timelines for the blog. This was somewhat
The mechanisms of the blog restricted me the freedom to display my blog posts, the bulk of my discussion and findings, in the manner that I would have wanted it displayed. Posts had to be ordered chronologically or within categories I had set in order for them to be reviewed. While this display structure is perfectly useful for blogs with material that is intended to be viewed, considered, discussed and replaced on a regular basis, it was not conducive to what I wanted to do. It was my desire to display events in some sort of story arc, supported by feature articles discussing life on the road, but blogs do not function as such. There is neither beginning nor end to a blog. The blog is designed to be a conduit of constant information sharing, discussion and knowledge. To try and graft a story arc or narrative onto this structure, as I did with my tour blog narrative and supporting features, was troublesome to say the least. A blog is designed not to reach any conclusion, but to continue being a forum for authors to post ideas (of both the bright or banal variety) until the author or blog owner decides to stop posts. A story told day by day may be useful for superficial discussions, but for my requirements, it wasn’t as helpful.
What was useful was the way the blog capabilities allowed my information to be separated and structure. The creation of separate pages worked well to divide material into separate areas for the reader’s use. The ability to use hyperlinks to create instantaneous reference to supporting material was very helpful, as was its use in supporting my argument that the internet as a tool for networking was invaluable to the independent musician. The blog also let me customize and make edits throughout the process even after material was posted.
Overall, my experience using Weblog (blog) outlets for my project was successful; however there were some definite restrictions in the display capabilities of the resource. In the future, incorporation of a narrative may not be the best idea, but certainly supporting material could be useful as a supplemental product of a study or argument. That is not to say that The Movable Beast cannot be a useful tool in understanding some of the subjects it discusses within its (web)pages, but perhaps a different look at the structure of the blog could illuminate better employment of blog potential.
__________________________________________________________________________
Findings & Conclusion to Objectives
At the beginning of this project, I outlined a list of topics I wanted to focus on throughout the material. This was meant to guide me in reaching a series of objectives I wanted to understand by the conclusion of the blog project. While there was no particular hypothesis I attempted to prove or disprove in the course of this study, my findings in regards to all my listed objectives has helped me construct a better understand of Canada and independent music today.
I had listed three main objectives I wanted to contemplate and share. These objectives and my conclusions are as follows:
Observation of the processes of the Canadian independent music community in 2009.
While the danger of my observations came close to being little more insightful than the average travelogue, my focus on the underground music and art sub-culture living in the city helped with my understanding of its existence. The capacity of specific regions within the urban confines to be forums of artistic expression was seen in every city I visited. These artistic enclaves allowed groups from specific sub-cultures to congregate with each other and express ideas, while interacting and creating links with those engaged in different creative endeavours all in one location. Given the economic reality of recent times in light of economic recession in the late 2000’s and also the habitual financial restrictions most bands have to cope with, it is a matter of survival that independent music groups from all sub-genres of music create music scenes and interurban connections with other bands to help support to continuation of their craft. Bands have long been able to support themselves in some capacity when economic reality and public awareness of bands are less than self-sustainable. My band, Endangered Ape, was consistently helped by members of other bands with sharing of band equipment, sharing bills for performances to increase public exposure, and sharing accommodations during travels. The feeling of community is implied, almost expected, for touring bands crossing the country. This mutual support, in terms of making connections to promoters, providing information about local music scenes, and even providing shelter for the night, ensures that the process can continue its existence. Without it, the means of touring for a vast majority of independent music groups would be unobtainable.
The use of the internet as a vital tool for musical groups to survive in a time of product saturation and relative market obscurity.
As I had mentioned in an earlier post, the employment of internet tools to organize and coordinate band activity is the most vital tool underground, independent musicians can utilize. Bands can communicate with groups in other cities, research information regarding government funding or upcoming trends, strengthen social networks, book venues for performances and share useful know-how on any number of websites. More than just creating links between music scenes across Canada, the internet is allowing artists to form as one cohesive music scene that operates beyond physical limitations and distance. With the proliferation of social networking sites being used as means advertise and promote artists, a saturation of the market has been noticed. Membership into the specific niches of countless musical sub-genres is being fought for over the internet today. There are simply too many bands vying for media attention for any but a few to gain commercial notoriety. Members of bands, or their representatives, then must utilize the free and (mostly) universally accessible internet as a medium for product advertisement and consumption. Thus, in order to have any success in band development, commercially or culturally within a particular sub-culture and/or beyond, an effective employment of internet resources is needed to make that happen. Bands must be proficient at exploiting the internet just as well as they are at writing songs. The question then is, which skill is more valuable, songwriting or using the web? Perhaps the bands of the future will need only to know the proper internet resources to use to become successful.
Personal understanding of Canada and Canadian identity through observations and research during cross-Canada journey.
This project, at its heart, is the chronicling of a journey across Canada in the summer of 2009. Much of my focus was on the distinction found, or rather perceived, in varying urban centres in Canada. As I mentioned in my earlier expectations found in the Objectives & Goals page of The Movable Beast blog, my initial conception of Canadian cities were that of distinguishable urban entities unique in culture and scope. While there would be superficial similarities to all cities I would visit, my hypothesis was that there is no classic, identifiable ‘Canadian City” or singular ‘Canadian culture’ present in the 21st Century. In my travels and notes regarding the matter, I found at least three factors that influenced these pre-conceived notions. Differences in the city environments and culture depend on the structure of the city (how it is planned and physically divided), the diversity of its demographics (people), and its proximity and influence to other urban systems, specifically in terms of culturally diffusion and dominance. As a member of a touring band, my time studying a city was superficial at best, staying for only a few days at maximum in one location. My observations were usually kept only to the area around a certain venue or in some cases, to major attractions located in the urban centre. From this, I determined that while all Canadian cities observed a basic suburban/urban division, specific areas were, as anticipated, most neighbourhoods were utilized by residents of a very close proximity. I make this claim using what I had observed in neighbourhoods that one would call “artistic enclaves” (Markusen 2007). Most lived within a few minutes commute to the areas of performance, specifically, artists living near venues that could accommodate the expression and consumption of these endeavours. Most outsiders were not present here. Influence from larger neighbouring cities in terms of dominance is felt in the background of these artistic neighbourhoods, as well. Depending on size, economic, political and cultural dominance can be felt influencing the decisions of citizens. I base this specifically on the decisions and art expressed from music groups in performance. Some musical and aesthetic elements appeared to be mimicking stylistic trends appearing in vogue in larger, more culturally prestigious cities. Halifax-based group Sloan made a very poignant reflection on this phenomenon with their 1994-released album, “Twice Removed”. This title suggested the cultural point-of-view from artists and groups from Halifax looking to Toronto for inspiration, while Torontonians themselves looking to New York City for their cultural cues. The view on taste and expression is then twice removed from its initial origin.
So perhaps maybe, there is the existence of a mainstream, exported view of Canadian culture. If so, it would only be one of many cultures within the state of Canada operating today. Whether they operate in conjunction with each other is entirely inconsequential to the existence and reproduction of its own identity. It is this diversity, I believe, is what “Canadian culture” really consists of, and what it is ultimately that is being celebrated. The Canada of the 19th and even mid-20th century is certainly a different one that is being seen today on the road across this land. As the world becomes ‘smaller’ with the proliferation of technology and communication, identity has become more and more specific to younger generations brought up on consumer targeting and lifestyle branding. Sub-groups, seen stratified within the urban setting, continue to change and adapt to their physical surroundings.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Thank you all for reading and reviewing this project.





















